Polar M430 GPS Running Watch

Sports/GPS Watches
POLAR
74
$99.99
Polar M430 GPS Running Watch 1
  1. SPORTING
  2. /
  3. Sports/GPS Watches
  4. /
  5. Polar M430 GPS Running Watch

Images

Polar M430
Polar M430
Polar M430
Polar M430

Videos

Where to Buy / Price History

Create Your Free Price Drop Alert!
Set Alert for Polar M430 Wrist Based Heart Rate & Gps Running Watch, White Small - $99.99

Price Statistics

  • All prices mentioned above are in United States dollar.
  • This product is available at eBay, Amzn, Amazon.com, Bestbuy.
  • At ebay.com you can purchase Polar M430 Wrist Based Heart Rate & Gps Running Watch, White Small for only $99.99, which is 57% less than the cost in Bestbuy ($229.95).
  • The lowest price of Polar - M430 GPS Running Watch - White was obtained on February 21, 2020 2:04 am.

// Related Products

// Company Profile – Polar

Polar is a Finnish fitness company that was started in 1977 by Seppo Säynäjäkangas. Polar is best known for creating their heart rate monitors, and is known for a number of fitness watches that use their world class heart rate monitors. – View Profile

3 reviews for Polar M430 GPS Running Watch

  1. Vissai

    Pros: lots. It’s an M400 that is lighter, has wrist based heart rate monitor, fast GPS acquire, and vibrating alerts.Cons: the initial setup, poor customer support, and frequent sync errors. (More on this below.)Delivery was extremely fast, but setting up the watch was a real pain. I tried it twice via phone (Android), failed both times at firmware update, having lost the Bluetooth signal (why does a product that’s being sold for two days need a new firmware is another question). Finally I connected it to a computer where the setup, update and sync completed in a reasonable amount of time, and I only had to resync once because of some error.The watch itself looks nice; similar to the M400 but different enough with its smoother touch and new wristband. If you had an M400 before, there won’t be surprises, the menu is practically the same.I’m yet to try it in action, when the pain of setup will have dwindled.Update #1: now that I have used it in action, one more star. The M430 is just great, the fifth star is missing due to it taking three attempts to sync.It is lighter than the M400, and while a couple of extra holes in the band don’t seem to achieve much, it does help with the sweating.The heart rate is more accurate than it was on the M200 (smooth raises and drops on the graph as I pedaled up slope and downhill, instead of noticing halfway that “hey, looks like we’re doing something, let’s crank it up from 90 to 155” ), even with indoor training where the wrist isn’t in a predictable position like it is when running.The buttons are quick to react, the menu is easy to use.Finally, the silent (buzzing) alarm is here. Being an early raiser married to a late sleeper, a quiet way to wake up is cherished.And now to the GPS.Is it accurate? Probably is. It measures the same distance my other watches measured, give or take a few meters. But… It finds a GPS signal instantly. Right away. No waiting.Remember when on cold, dark late autumn mornings you had to wait for a minute or two in the icy rain and wind for the GPS signal? Or when you wanted to measure the distance from the supermarket to your doorstep to prove it is *exactly* one mile*, and your husband and sister politely laughed at you while you waited for your watch to find that signal? Never again!To summarize: set it up using a computer, be patient with the phone sync, enjoy the watch.*It is.Update#2: Attached is how a 6k run looks with the good old H7 sensor, vs the M430. There are differences, but they are minor, and the two graphs are practically the same.Update#3: as expected, the HR accuracy is somewhat worse during weightlifting-type activities. (attached a second picture) Here I did some front- and back squats, followed by four minutes of deadlifts alternating with burpees (during which I placed the phone recording the H7 on a nearby shelf that was too far for this Bluetooth protocol, hence the gaps). The proportions are more or less there, but the numbers differ significantly. This is something I was expecting following my adventures with the M200; the accuracy improves with the band being tightened just the right way, and if one manages to sweat moderately, but (a) few are lucky enough to remain fresh and dry after 30 deadlifts and burpees (b) even then it is far from accurate.If you want accuracy, go with the chest sensor.I’ll try biking next.Update #4:The watch stopped syncing. It connects, then claims that sync is completed after 1-2 seconds. I have to plug it into a computer. Disappointing.After reinstalling the Polar Flow client, it syncs again, who knows for how long.Update #5:I think I figured out the sync issue. For whatever reason, the phone app switches the device off after every couple of syncs. Switching it on again (Settings – Devices) usually helps; if it doesn’t, connect the watch to a computer or reinstall the app.I’d like to mention how poor support from Polar was. I reported the sync issue to them, detailing all the troubleshooting steps I took; they responded after several days with a canned response suggesting some troubleshooting steps – some I wrote them to have tried already (wasn’t even the full list), and nothing since.The final verdict is 3 stars.

  2. Kang

    I purchased this device in July 2017 and have worn it for 83 different run/bike sessions. It had all the features I needed (heart rate, water resistance, gps tracking); however, proved to be a poorly manufactured product. The buttons on the device became very mushy within the first two months. The two bottons in fact often get stuck in the down position.The other buttons dont get stuck; however, the button action is very unsatisfying and gives very poor feedback.I began the Polar warranty process online. Unfortunately, Polar does charge for shipping for repairs.Great initial value with great features; however, I can’t recommend this product due to its poor build quality. You can see in the photo that I uploaded that the button on the bottom right is flush to the watch surface.

  3. yogaski

    This is the second M430 I’ve purchased in the last 3 weeks. The first watch works perfectly and I’m very satisfied with it. I bought a second M430 as a gift. This watch is not the same product as the first purchase. Many of the functions in the first watch (which I use and are necessary for proper functioning) aren’t present in this watch. The packaging and instructions are of lesser quality than the first watch and raise my suspicions of a fake Polar.I’ve used their watches, heart rate monitors and Polar flow for at least 10 years. I’ve never had a problem with their products so my concerns do have some basis.This is a very good product but I suggest you look elsewhere for an M430.

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
Oculus Rift S
Next Post
Recon Jet Smart Eyewear
Like this article? Share with your friends!

You May Also Like

Menu